https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/20047 2026-04-17T07:52:58Z https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/44376 Título: Ato concertado para apoio do juízo estatal ao juízo arbitral em matéria probatória Autor(es): Morais, Gabriela Expósito Tenório Miranda de Primeiro Orientador: Oliveira Filho, João Glicério Abstract: Although arbitration is a part of the Brazilian justice system and operates independently from the Judiciary, it is undeniable that there is interaction between these systems—arbitration and state courts. This paper aims to set forth the minimum content of a primary coordinated agreement (“ato concertado primário”) between an arbitral institution and a state court in cases where (i) support is needed to enforce decisions or to ensure greater efficiency in the arbitration proceedings; (ii) there is a common issue of fact in both ongoing arbitral and judicial proceedings, in which case the state court may produce evidence with the participation of the arbitral tribunal. Our objective was to ensure that, based on this primary coordinated agreement, other secondary acts of cooperation may be entered into, dispensing with the use of the arbitral letter (“carta arbitral”), unless the parties to the arbitration negotiate otherwise. We have identified the following elements that should comprise the primary coordinated agreement: parties; subject matter; addressing the request for support; the form of request for support; regulations on budget estimates; indication of the arbitration agreement as the most appropriate instrument for entering into a procedural legal transaction to avoid the application of the rules of the primary coordinated agreement on arbitration; publicity of the primary coordinated agreement; regulation of the possibility of confidentiality in the performance of cooperative acts; indication of the documents required to submit such a request; regulation of the hearing of the parties in proceedings where secondary cooperation acts will be entered into; definition of jurisdiction over incidental evidentiary issues; and forms of challenge available to the parties in the arbitral proceedings in the event of noncompliance by the courts with the duty of cooperation. Editora / Evento / Instituição: Universidade Federal da Bahia Tipo: Tese 2025-12-09T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/44347 Título: Desigualdade e invisibilização étnico-raciais nos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Direito do Brasil: diagnósticos e iniciativas para a superação desse quadro. Autor(es): Lima, Raphael Leal Roldão Primeiro Orientador: Silva, Tagore Trajano de Almeida Abstract: This thesis aims to analyze ethnic-racial inequality and invisibilization within the country's Graduate Programs in Law (PPGDs), based on an analysis of racism – in its various dimensions and as a structure of social inequality – the history and structure of the National Graduate System (SNPG), as well as the diagnosis of the underrepresentation of black professors and students in these academic spaces and the non-existence and outdatedness of the respective ethnic-racial data. The research problem is embodied in the following questions: a) is there ethnic-racial inequality and invisibilization in Brazilian PPGDs?; b) what affirmative actions and policies can be developed to address them?; and c) is binding regulation of these actions necessary?. The methodology adopted is matrix-based, articulating empirical and theoretical-dogmatic research strategies. The thesis is part of the matrix research "Racial Justice and Access to Education: training and promotion to solve the deficit of black students and professors in the Graduate Programs in Law in the North and Northeast Regions" and is part of the "Abdias Nascimento" research group. Part of the empirical data was collected and shared by the members of the group, and another portion was collected by the author, from official databases such as the Sucupira Platform and GeoCAPES. Regarding the theoretical contribution, a systematic and narrative literature review was carried out on topics such as racisms, ethnic-racial inequality, affirmative action policies, the SNPG, and research in Law in Brazil, in addition to a national and international normative and jurisprudential analysis. Regarding the logical-methodological reasoning that guides this articulation between the collected data and the mobilized theories, this work incorporates the abductive methodology. The structure of the thesis culminated in the writing of five chapters: the second analyzes the evolution of the concept of racism in its various dimensions and as a structure of social inequality; the third examines the normative and jurisprudential advances in the fight against racism, in Brazil and in the world, and the SDG-18 initiative; the fourth analyzes the structuring of graduate studies in Brazil and the SNPG; the fifth examines the trajectory of legal research and the quantitative situation of the PPGDs, from a regional and racial perspective; and the sixth and final chapter discusses the indispensability of adopting ethnic-racial affirmative action policies in the context of the PPGDs, presenting propositions and initiatives and supporting the need for guiding and binding legal-normative mechanisms that enable their full implementation. This thesis concludes that there is ethnic-racial inequality and invisibilization in Brazilian PPGDs, embodied in an institutional and structural/structured racism and by the need for the implementation of concrete affirmative actions and policies, necessarily instrumentalized by guiding and binding regulations. Editora / Evento / Instituição: Universidade Federal da Bahia Tipo: Tese 2026-02-24T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/44257 Título: Monitoramento de processos estruturais e políticas públicas: uma análise comparativa entre o Supremo Tribunal Federal brasileiro e a Corte Constitucional Colombiana Autor(es): Santos, Yago da Costa Nunes dos Primeiro Orientador: Cruz, Gabriel Dias Marques da Abstract: This study analyzed the monitoring of structural decisions through a comparison between the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) and the Colombian Constitutional Court (CCC), aiming to assess the extent to which the latter's experience can offer parameters adaptable to the Brazilian institutional context. Based on the comparative method proposed by Ran Hirschl, grounded in the principle of the most similar cases, the research adopted a qualitative, comparative legal approach, focused on examining paradigmatic decisions and the supervisory mechanisms developed in each country. It argues that democratic constitutionalism imposes on constitutional courts the challenge of addressing persistent state failures through structural judicial orders, the fulfillment of which depends on inter-institutional articulation and continuous monitoring. In the Colombian scenario, the recognition of the State of Unconstitutional Affairs and the creation of Special Monitoring Chambers reveal how constitutional jurisdiction can assume a role in coordinating and overseeing public policies without compromising the balance of powers. In Brazil, although the Supreme Federal Court (STF) has advanced in practices inspired by this model – such as the creation of the Nucleus for Complex Structural Processes (Nupec) and the Nucleus for Consensual Conflict Resolution (Nusol), in addition to the establishment of working groups in specific cases – it has not yet consolidated a stable procedural format for monitoring structural reforms. The thesis argued that the complete transplantation of the Colombian archetype would be inadequate, but recognizes that its cooperative logic can inspire solutions compatible with the limitations of the Brazilian system. It advocates the adoption of a decentralized monitoring arrangement, based on judicial collaboration and the functional delegation of powers, through groups composed of magistrates and specialists, with predominantly remote operation and under the supervision of the STF. This configuration would make it possible to rationalize the Court's procedural workload, increase the effectiveness of public policies, and provide greater sensitivity to federal specificities. It is concluded that the combination of inter-institutional cooperation, decentralization, and technical specialization offers sufficient foundations to consolidate a national model for judicial monitoring of public policies, capable of adapting the lessons of the Colombian experience to Brazilian institutional conditions.; Este estudio analizó el seguimiento de decisiones estructurales a través de una comparación entre el Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) de Brasil y la Corte Constitucional de Colombia (CCC), con el objetivo de evaluar en qué medida la experiencia de esta última puede ofrecer parámetros adaptables al contexto institucional brasileño. Con base en el método comparativo propuesto por Ran Hirschl, fundamentado en el principio de los casos más similares, la investigación adoptó un enfoque jurídico comparativo cualitativo, centrado en examinar decisiones paradigmáticas y los mecanismos de supervisión desarrollados en cada país. Argumenta que el constitucionalismo democrático impone a los tribunales constitucionales el desafío de abordar las fallas estatales persistentes a través de órdenes judiciales estructurales, cuyo cumplimiento depende de la articulación interinstitucional y el seguimiento continuo. En el escenario colombiano, el reconocimiento del Estado de Asuntos Inconstitucionales y la creación de Salas Especiales de Seguimiento revelan cómo la jurisdicción constitucional puede asumir un papel en la coordinación y supervisión de las políticas públicas sin comprometer el equilibrio de poderes. En Brasil, si bien el Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) ha avanzado en prácticas inspiradas en este modelo —como la creación del Núcleo de Procesos Estructurales Complejos (Nupec) y el Núcleo de Resolución Consensual de Conflictos (Nusol), además del establecimiento de grupos de trabajo en casos específicos—, aún no ha consolidado un formato procesal estable para el seguimiento de las reformas estructurales. La tesis argumentó que la adopción completa del arquetipo colombiano sería inadecuada, pero reconoce que su lógica cooperativa puede inspirar soluciones compatibles con las limitaciones del sistema brasileño. Aboga por la adopción de un mecanismo de seguimiento descentralizado, basado en la colaboración judicial y la delegación funcional de competencias, a través de grupos compuestos por magistrados y especialistas, con funcionamiento predominantemente remoto y bajo la supervisión del STF. Esta configuración permitiría racionalizar la carga procesal del Tribunal, aumentar la eficacia de las políticas públicas y brindar mayor sensibilidad a las especificidades federales. Se concluye que la combinación de cooperación interinstitucional, descentralización y especialización técnica ofrece bases suficientes para consolidar un modelo nacional de seguimiento judicial de las políticas públicas, capaz de adaptar las lecciones de la experiencia colombiana a las condiciones institucionales brasileñas. Editora / Evento / Instituição: Universidade Federal da Bahia Tipo: Tese 2026-02-24T00:00:00Z https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/44208 Título: Interpretação jurídica e Inteligência Artificial: raciocínio e linguagem entre o paradigma da racionalidade e inferência e o paradigma da imaginação Autor(es): Schurig, Alessandra Scherma Primeiro Orientador: Miguel, Daniel Oitaven Pamponet Abstract: The thesis proposes the hypothesis of an inseparable connection between legal interpretative reasoning and language and, based on this hypothesis, examines the possibility of artificial systems performing legal interpretation. These ideas are investigated through qualitative exploratory research, conducted by integrating philosophy of language, natural language processing, and theories of legal interpretation, organized into two opposing theoretical models: the Paradigm of Rationality and Inference and the Paradigm of Imagination. This theoretical foundation demonstrates that, from their conception, artificial systems must follow a specific theoretical perspective to process language and formulate heuristic rules to artificially replicate reasoning. Furthermore, it highlights that this perspective will have direct consequences on the results generated by these systems and on the concept of language comprehension. From this perspective, legal artificial intelligence systems and their developments in analytical, deductive, or analogical reasoning models are analyzed, identifying vulnerabilities related to how artificial intelligence processes language. These vulnerabilities result in different forms of opacity, biases, projection issues, the need for linking explicit and implicit knowledge, flaws in relevance selection, difficulties in performing deductive, inductive, and abductive inferences, challenges in handling common-sense knowledge, problems of overfitting and underfitting, and complexities in safeguarding different spheres of the principle of transparency. These challenges can affect procedural constitutional guarantees, such as due process, adversarial proceedings, judicial impartiality, and the reasoning behind judicial decisions. Editora / Evento / Instituição: Universidade Federal da Bahia Tipo: Tese 2025-08-20T00:00:00Z