Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/6702
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAngelo, Ana Luiza Dias-
dc.contributor.authorAngelo, Camila Dias-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Alex José Leite-
dc.contributor.authorRamos, André Maurício Costa-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Márcia-
dc.contributor.authorMartins Netto, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorBrites, Carlos-
dc.creatorAngelo, Ana Luiza Dias-
dc.creatorAngelo, Camila Dias-
dc.creatorTorres, Alex José Leite-
dc.creatorRamos, André Maurício Costa-
dc.creatorLima, Márcia-
dc.creatorMartins Netto, Eduardo-
dc.creatorBrites, Carlos-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-06T13:41:48Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-06T13:41:48Z-
dc.date.issued2007-10-
dc.identifier.issn1413-8670-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/6702-
dc.descriptionp.466-470pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated total lymphocyte count (TLC) as a substitute marker for CD4+ cell counts to identify patients who need prophylaxis against opportunistic infection (CD4 < 200 cells/mm3) and patients with CD4 < 350 cells/mm3 (Brazilian threshold value of CD4 count to define AIDS). We evaluated TLC and CD4+ cells count of 1,174 HIV-infected patients, in Salvador, Brazil, from May 2003 to September 2004. CD4+ cell counts were performed by flow cytometry, and TLC was measured with an automated hematological counter. The mean CD4 count was 430 cells/mm3 (range: 4 to 2,531 cells/mm3). Mean TLC was 1,900 cells/mm3 (range: 300 to 6,200 cells/mm3). Using a threshold value of 1,000 cells/mm3 for TLC, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 77% for CD4 < 200 cells/mm3, but the sensitivity was only 29%, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88%, with 98% specificity. Similar findings were observed for CD4 count < 350. Using the same threshold value of 1,000 cells/mm3 for TLC, sensitivity was 14%, and specificity 99% (PPV= 94%; NPV=62%). In 70/1,510 (5%) of the samples the sum of CD4 and CD8 cell counts was greater than the TLC and in 27% (419/1,510) this sum was below 65% of the TLC. TLC has a high specificity to identify patients for prophylaxis, but a quite low sensitivity. It is not useful as an alternative to CD4+ T-cell counts as a marker in HIV-infected patients.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherThe Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Contexto Publishingpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-86702007000500005pt_BR
dc.subjectLymphocyte countspt_BR
dc.subjectCD4 countspt_BR
dc.subjectAIDSpt_BR
dc.titleEvaluating total lymphocyte counts as a substitute for CD4 counts in the follow up of AIDS patientspt_BR
dc.title.alternativeBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.description.localpubSalvadorpt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 11, n. 5pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Faculdade de Medicina)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Angelo, Ana Luiza Dias.pdf85,63 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.