Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/6349
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Alessandro de Moura-
dc.contributor.authorCotrim, Helma Pinchemel-
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Daniel Batista Valente-
dc.contributor.authorAthayde, Luciana Gordilho Matteoni de-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Adimeia Souza-
dc.contributor.authorBitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira-
dc.creatorAlmeida, Alessandro de Moura-
dc.creatorCotrim, Helma Pinchemel-
dc.creatorBarbosa, Daniel Batista Valente-
dc.creatorAthayde, Luciana Gordilho Matteoni de-
dc.creatorSantos, Adimeia Souza-
dc.creatorBitencourt, Almir Galvão Vieira-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-05T19:20:51Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-05T19:20:51Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.issn1007-9327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/6349-
dc.descriptionp. 1415-1418pt_BR
dc.description.abstractAIM: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of abdominal ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in severe obese subjects and its relation to histological grade of steatosis. METHODS: A consecutive series of obese patients,who underwent bariatric surgery from October 2004 to May 2005, was selected. Ultrasonography was performed in all patients as part of routine preoperative time and an intraoperative wedge biopsy was obtained at the beginning of the bariatric surgery. The US and histological findings of steatosis were compared, considering histology as the gold standard. RESULTS: The study included 105 patients. The mean age was 37.2 ± 10.6 years and 75.2% were female. The histological prevalence of steatosis was 89.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of US in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis were, respectively, 64.9% (95% CI:54.9-74.3) and 90.9% (95% CI: 57.1-99.5). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were, respectively, 98.4% (95% CI: 90.2-99.9) and 23.3%(95% CI: 12.3-39.0). The presence of steatosis onUS was associated to advanced grades of steatosis on histology (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Preoperative abdominal US in our series has not shown to be an accurate method for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in severe obese patients. Until another non-invasive method demonstrates better sensitivity and specificity values, histological evaluation may be recommended to these patients undergoing bariatric surgery.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/14/1415.pdfpt_BR
dc.subjectBariatric surgerypt_BR
dc.subjectObesitypt_BR
dc.subjectHepatic steatosispt_BR
dc.subjectAbdominal ultrasound diagnosispt_BR
dc.subjectFatty liverpt_BR
dc.titleFatty liver disease in severe obese patients: Diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasoundpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeWorld Journal of Gastroenterologypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 14, n. 9pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico (Faculdade de Medicina)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1415.pdf677,74 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.