Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/14815
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Maria de Fátima Fernandes Pussick-
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, Sandra Maria Conceição-
dc.contributor.authorMedrado, Fabíola Eloy da Rocha-
dc.contributor.authorAssis, Ana Marlucia de Oliveira-
dc.creatorNunes, Maria de Fátima Fernandes Pussick-
dc.creatorPinheiro, Sandra Maria Conceição-
dc.creatorMedrado, Fabíola Eloy da Rocha-
dc.creatorAssis, Ana Marlucia de Oliveira-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-10T11:18:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-10T11:18:15Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn1519-3829-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/14815-
dc.descriptionp. 51-60pt_BR
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: to assess the accuracy of the Capurro somatic and ultrasound methods, taking date of last menstruation as a reference point, for evaluating gestational age and anthropometric classification of term newborns. METHODS: a prevalence study was carried out involving 309 pregnant women and their term newborns, 92 of whom were small for gestational age and 217 appropriate sized for gestational age, at two public maternity hospitals in the Brazilian city of Salvador. The evaluation of the differences between the median gestational age according to the two methods was carried out using the non-parametric "Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test." The accuracy of the methods for evaluating gestational age for the small for gestational age newborns was estimated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve. RESULTS: compared to ultrasound, the Capurro method overestimated the gestational age in newbornsof less than 39 weeks and underestimated it in older newborns. Ultrasound underestimated gestational agein newborns with more than 37 weeks. CONCLUSION: ultrasound was found to have greater sensitivity for prediction of small for age newborns (96.6%), while the Capurro method presented greater specificity (75.5%). The highest accuracy was obtained using ultrasound in the 41st gestational week (ROC=77.0%).pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292011000100006pt_BR
dc.subjectGestational agept_BR
dc.subjectInfantpt_BR
dc.subjectSmall for gestational agept_BR
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificitypt_BR
dc.subjectIdade gestacionalpt_BR
dc.subjectRecém-nascido pequeno para a idade gestacionalpt_BR
dc.subjectSensibilidade e Especificidadept_BR
dc.titleEstimating gestational age and its relation to the anthropometric status of newborns: a study comparing the Capurro and ultrasound methods with last menstrual periodpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeRevista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 11, n. 1pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico Estrangeiro (ISC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Maria de Fátima Pussick Nunes.pdf402,06 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.