Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/12020
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPassos, Johelle de Santana-
dc.contributor.authorGomes Filho, Isaac Suzart-
dc.contributor.authorVianna, Maria Isabel Pereira-
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Simone Seixas da-
dc.contributor.authorBarreto, Mauricio Lima-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Tiago José Silva-
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Leandro Dias-
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Fernanda Marques-
dc.creatorPassos, Johelle de Santana-
dc.creatorGomes Filho, Isaac Suzart-
dc.creatorVianna, Maria Isabel Pereira-
dc.creatorCruz, Simone Seixas da-
dc.creatorBarreto, Mauricio Lima-
dc.creatorOliveira, Tiago José Silva-
dc.creatorBorges, Leandro Dias-
dc.creatorMonteiro, Fernanda Marques-
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T17:15:16Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-25T17:15:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/12020-
dc.descriptionp. 1773-1780pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: The present study aims to compare different diagnostic criteria for periodontal disease that were used to study the association between periodontal disease and osteoporosis. Methods: A database from a case-control study was used. The present study included sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-condition data; panoramic radiographs; and clinical measurements on periodontal conditions from 139 postmenopausal women. Each participant was classified with regard to the diagnosis of periodontal disease using five different criteria for the outcome measurement (OM) found in the literature in studies on the association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease (OM1 through OM5). The frequency of periodontal disease and diagnostic values were calculated taking OM5 as the gold standard and the main association measurement for all criteria using odds ratios. Results: The frequency of periodontal disease varied from 24.5% to 98.6% depending on the OM used. OM4 and OM3 presented the highest specificity (98.9% and 94.5%, respectively), whereas OM2 and OM1 presented the highest sensitivity (100% and 77.1%, respectively). The association measurements with adjustments for age and smoking varied significantly according to the OM over a range from 1.87 to 3.75, and there were also variations in the statistical significance of the associations found. Conclusions: The results of this study emphasize that the frequency of periodontal disease may be influenced by different OMs and indicated variations outside of the association between osteoporosis and periodontal disease. Therefore, there is a need for prior selection of a precise measurement of periodontal disease in investigations on this topic.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.sourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100143pt_BR
dc.subjectDiagnosispt_BR
dc.subjectepidemiologypt_BR
dc.subjectosteoporosispt_BR
dc.subjectperiodontitispt_BR
dc.subjectreproducibility of resultspt_BR
dc.titleOutcome measurements in studies on the association between osteoporosis and periodontal diseasept_BR
dc.title.alternativeJournal of Periodontologypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.numberv. 81, n. 12pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Artigo Publicado em Periódico Estrangeiro (ISC)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Johelle Passos.pdf481,89 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.